David Imel, The Verge:
But in our current moment, the photos people are drawn to are not
flawlessâââand thatâs created a real problem for the people
making smartphone cameras. âThe gap between what two random people
want from their camera is growing dramatically,â says Isaac
Reynolds, who leads the Pixel camera team at Google. Some people
want a perfectly optimized photo, Reynolds says. âBut thereâs a
growing number of people who want something that they feel is more
authentic or traditional, by their definition.â
Thatâs what Reynolds and the Pixel team are setting out to solve
with Camera Looks, a total rethink of how the camera captures and
styles an image on the Pixel 11 series. The phones include a new
suite of processing tools aimed at giving people much more
control over the cameraâs output. At first glance, they look a
lot like filters, with names like Black Tie, Classic, and most
strikingly, Digi, in reference to the growing trend of buying
cheap digital cameras from the early aughts. But unlike a filter,
which generally applies editing tweaks after the processing
happens, Camera Looks is changing how image data is processed at
the sensor level.
This sounds a lot like Appleâs âPhotographic Stylesâ in the iPhone 13 and later, but with the addition of some control over grain and sharpness. I love grain, and the thing I like least about Appleâs built-in photo processing is the way it attempts to eliminate all noise. I like digital cameras that embrace noise and try to make it pleasing, rather than over-processing to try to pretend these tiny sensors arenât inherently noisy. So I say kudos to Google for loosening up on âeveryone gets the over-sharpened, over-smoothed lookâ.
But, that said, whatâs made me happy over the last year is shooting almost all my photos with third-party appsâââin particular, Halide, Not Boring Camera, and Analogueâââthat give me low-level control over processing through LUTs (or in Halideâs parlance, âlooksâ). These apps give me the looks I want just through point-and-shoot photography. No need to process images after shooting. But because they (optionally) shoot RAW, I can reprocess in post without losing any original sensor data. I can shoot in black-and-white and subsequently change my mind and reprocess with a color look later. These apps enable honest film-look photography without looking at all gimmicky, and without baking any sort of filtering into the image data in my camera roll. Itâs the best of both worlds. Itâs also way, way fussier than the built-in Camera app should be.
Anyway, all this Pixel announcement news today has me thinking that these days, I never hear much about Pixel cameras or image processing. In the early years of the Pixel lineup, there was a common view that Pixel phones were the best camera phones in the world. I never believed that, but I did think they were an interesting alternative, taking different but equally valid philosophical choices than Apple. Apple has always insisted on instant processing. You snap the shutter and the iPhone saves your image instantly. Pixel cameras often undertook seconds-long processing. That enabled features the iPhone couldnât offer.
I think itâs pretty easy to pinpoint when things changed for Pixelâââwhen Marc Levoy left Google for Adobe in 2020 (where he now leads the team making the very intriguing Indigo camera app, that is exclusively available for iPhone and which offers a slew of innovative computational photography features).
When Levoy was leading Googleâs camera photography team, there was a credible argument that Pixel phones were the best still camera phones in the world. (They were never even close on video.) Ever since, I never hear about them except in the middle of August each year, when Google announces new Pixel hardware. See you in 12 months.
 â